Saturday, July 20, 2013

On the Virginia GOP

Before I head out of Virginia for a little while, I figured a fitting last post in the capitol of the Confederacy would be something along the lines of "What Exactly is Wrong with Virginia Republican Candidates (and do they hear the words that are coming out of their mouths)?"

So the Virginia GOP has given their nods to Gubernatorial and Attorney General candidates.  First on the chopping block is my good friend Ken Cuccinelli, who you may have heard of in his many attempts to restrict women's access to abortion, planned parenthood, and bodily autonomy.  He's a good man, I assure you.  Cuccinelli's most recent move has been to take Virginia's infamous sodomy law (which bans sodomy, oral sex, and, assuming they have kept the full text of the original law, sex with the lights on, and classifies them all as a felony offense) to the Supreme Court.  Now, in 2003, the Supreme Court declared state sodomy laws unconstitutional, on the grounds that, oddly enough, they persecute people whose partners do not have the opposite set of parts required for traditional intercourse, and also because we typically accept that you have a right to privacy and what you do in your own home between consenting adults is your own business.

But not only is Cuccinelli taking this to the Supreme Court, hoping they'll overturn or adjust their ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, but he posted on his campaign site that 90 new sexual predators (because, you know, felony sexual violations, like this one, will get you registered as a sex offender) will come off the sex offender registry.  Because gay sex and pedophilia are totally the same thing and this totally isn't a scare tactic.

Our other WTF of the day comes at the suggestion of one of my readers (you can like the WCS page on facebook and make post suggestions if you'd like).  Virginia's Republican Attorney General candidate is a man named Mark Obenshain, who in 2009 proposed an interesting bill.  This would require women who miscarry to report their miscarriage to the police within 24 hours or face legal penalties.  Now, there is a pro-choice/pro-life angle that one could attack this from, but I'm going to let that go for now and look at it quite simply: miscarriages are often painful and emotionally traumatizing.  Many of the women who experience them were incredibly excited to have a child.  To attempt to force a woman who is already going through this kind of emotional turmoil to compound it by forcing her to talk to the police is inhumane.  And this is the man the Virginia GOP wants in charge of enforcing Virginia laws.

All that being said, I'll be spending the next few weeks in Pennsylvania and North Carolina and will keep you all up to date with my ramblings and happenings.

Frustratedly yours,
Rachel Leigh

2 comments:

  1. What is the purpose of the miscarriage reporting law (beyond control of women's bodies)? Suspicion of domestic abuse?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's in response to a woman who dumped her miscarried child into a dumpster. Basically to prevent cases of women intentionally miscarrying (aborting) by forcing them to report "legitimate" miscarriages.

    ReplyDelete

Please let me know what you think!

Project Wonderful